True Crime Chronciles' Justice came quick for Carroll County "father" who abused and murdered his daughters
- Dennis McCaslin
- 13 minutes ago
- 4 min read



n the summer of 1887, the picturesque town of Eureka Springs, nestled in the rugged hills of Carroll County, was a beacon of hope and healing. Founded just eight years earlier around its famed mineral springs, the Victorian-era resort drew thousands seeking cures for ailments of body and spirit.
Grand hotels like the Crescent perched on bluffs, and winding streets buzzed with tourists, locals, and the promise of renewal. But beneath this veneer of prosperity lurked darker undercurrents--poverty, isolation, and a frontier justice that often bypassed the courtroom.
It was here, on July 24, 1887, that one of the most harrowing tales of familial horror and vigilante retribution unfolded. William Morrison, a white man in his likely thirties or forties (records offer no precise age), stood accused of unspeakable crimes against his own blood: the incestuous abuse and murder of his two young daughters.

The girls, tragically unnamed in surviving accounts, were described only as "young daughters," their ages lost to history---perhaps preteens or younger, vulnerable in an era when child protections were scant. Their mother, if she existed as Morrison's wife at the time, remains a ghost in the narrative; no name, no fate, no voice emerges from the scant records.
Whether she was deceased, estranged, or silenced by the events, her identity eludes historians, leaving a void that underscores the era's disregard for women's stories in such tragedies.
Morrison's background is equally shrouded. He does not appear in the 1880 federal census for Carroll County, suggesting he may have been a transient laborer or recent arrival to the area, drawn by the town's boom. Eureka Springs, with its population swelling to over 3,000 by the mid-1880s, was a melting pot of opportunists--miners, hotel workers, and families scraping by on the fringes.
What is known is that Morrison confessed to "maltreating" his daughters, a euphemism that newspaper reports delicately used to veil the horrors of sexual abuse and homicide. Details of the crimes are sparse, likely due to the Victorian press's reluctance to print graphic accounts, but the confession painted a picture of prolonged incestuous violation culminating in the girls' deaths.
Whether the murders were to silence their suffering or an escalation of rage remains speculative; no autopsy reports or trial transcripts survive, as justice never reached a courtroom

.The confession came swiftly, perhaps under duress from local authorities or neighbors who had grown suspicious. Morrison was arrested and lodged in the city jail--a modest wooden structure in the heart of town, ill-equipped to withstand the fury that followed.
Word spread like wildfire through the close-knit community. Neighbors, incensed by the betrayal of paternal duty in an age when family was sacrosanct, gathered outside the jail that fateful evening.
This was no organized posse but a spontaneous mob of locals--men from nearby farms and boarding houses, fueled by outrage and the era's tolerance for extrajudicial punishment.
As dusk fell on July 24, the crowd swelled, surrounding the jail. They broke in without resistance, seizing Morrison from his cell. Dragged through the streets, he was taken not to some remote gallows but to his own yard--a deliberate cruelty, ensuring his final moments were witnessed by any remaining family.
There, under a tree on his property, the mob noosed a rope around his neck and hoisted him high. Accounts vary slightly: most newspapers reported a straightforward hanging, his body "stretched up" in plain view. However, one historical lynching compilation notes he was "riddled with bullets," suggesting perhaps a post-hanging desecration.

Either way, Morrison's death was swift and public, a spectacle meant to restore communal honor through vengeance.
The aftermath was as silent as the crimes were loud. No members of the mob were identified, arrested, or prosecuted--a common outcome in post-Reconstruction Arkansas, where lynchings were often tacitly endorsed as "swift justice" for heinous acts, especially those involving children.
The event made brief waves in out-of-state newspapers, with one-paragraph dispatches in the Kansas City Times headlined "Hanged in His Own Yard," the Fredonia (Kansas) Democrat's "Additional Dispatches," and the Dayton (Ohio) Herald's "Lynched by His Neighbors."
Strikingly, no Arkansas papers covered it, perhaps due to local shame or editorial caution in a state grappling with racial and social violence.

Burial details for the victims and suspect are frustratingly absent from records, a reflection of the era's incomplete documentation. The daughters, their short lives ended in tragedy, were likely interred in a pauper's grave or family plot in one of Eureka Springs' early cemeteries, such as the Eureka Springs Cemetery (established around 1889, but earlier burials occurred informally).
No markers bearing their names have been identified in modern surveys. Morrison himself may have been denied a Christian burial, his body left to rot or hastily buried in an unmarked spot outside town limits--a common fate for lynching victims to deter sympathy.
Genealogical searches of Morrison family histories in the region yield no matches, further isolating this branch from recorded lineage
.This case, while not racially motivated (Morrison was white, as were his presumed assailants), fits into Arkansas's grim lynching legacy during the Gilded Age. From 1875 to 1900, the state saw dozens of such extralegal killings, often for crimes like rape or murder that inflamed public passions
. The Morrison lynching highlights how mob violence extended beyond racial lines, serving as a tool for community self-regulation in rural areas where formal law was slow or mistrusted.
Yet it also exposes the vulnerabilities of the time: children unprotected, women erased, and justice warped by emotion.T
oday, Eureka Springs thrives as a quirky tourist haven, its springs still drawing seekers of wellness. But echoes of 1887 linger in the archives--a reminder that even places of healing can harbor deep wounds.
